Conversion Lens Dsc
| Powered by phpBay Pro |

is it necessary or practical to use a wide conversion lens on my digital camera?
i have a sony cybershot DSC-W7 . sometime when i make a group picture, i move farther away to capture all the person. eventually, the images of the people became smaller and sometimes unrecognizable.
Now, am thinking that i would try to buy a wide conversion lens, but i have no idea how the image would be look like it try to use it in a group picture.
Does the image became smaller as well if i use a wide conversion lens like the way i did going farther if i don't have wide lens? i mean the only difference is that, i don't go farther away from the image..
please advice.
thanks
wide conversion lens also known as wide angle lens for other cam products
There are a few problems with the wide angle lens option.
First and foremost, yes, the details (not the image itself, which would still be a 7 megapixel one, just covering a wider crop of the scene) would become smaller, pretty much the same as if you moved further away.
Second, it might not be as cheap as you possibly thought. Mind you, it's not just the lens itself (which, in the case of the one made by Sony, the VCL-DH0730, is listed as costing about 80$), it's also the conversion lens adapter, because you can't just stick the lens to the camera, there's no screw in it, so you first have to attach the adapter (which will cost you another 25$) to the camera, then the wide-angle lens to the adapter. There might be other wide angle lenses from different manufacturers, but you'll have to buy the conversion adapter anyway, and then make sure that those other wide lenses adapt to a 30 mm. screw. There might be little choice in the market, especially if you seek a minimum quality -and of course at a reasonable price.
Third, there'll be a certain loss of quality, particularly sharpness, compared to what you would obtain if the camera had the native wide focal length you want in a single lens group. It will be so even with the one made by Sony, but many third-party lenses, especially the cheaper ones, will probably be way too bad.
As Kevin said, your best option is to try and make a consecutive, panoramic shooting. That'll allow you to keep all the detail your camera can offer at a closer range, simply because the final panorama will be (almost) the sum of several, full-resolution pictures.
The problem could be that, unless you're shooting perfectly still objects, some of them might move between shots, and if they appear in more than one picture (that is, if they're in the overlapping zone between pictures), some -if not most- panorama programs might eighter get confused, or make a mess of the stitching. Fortunately, there are some advanced enough to take that possiblity into account, and help you correct the problem, either by simply compositing the pictures into separate layers (that you can then blend in Photoshop as you see fit), or by semi-automatically detecting movement changes in overlapping zones and allowing you to select which version/picture you want to keep for the composited panorama. One of such, which happens to be free, easy enough to use and quite effective, is Microsoft's GroupShot:
http://research.microsoft.com/projects/GroupShot/
Items Recently Purchased From This Site:
| Powered by phpBay Pro |
Best Posts
- Series Service Repair
- Battery Sony Ccd
- Replacement Lcd Screen
- Vision Waterproof Wireless
- Cover Parts Repair
- Zeiss Jena Tessar
- Telephoto Tele Lens
- Dual Charger Canon
- Top Cover Plate
- Jvc Minidv Digital
- Dock Insert Adapter
- Nikon Lens Cap
- Red Yellow Green
- Camera Parts Oem
- Camera Hood Petal
Categories
- Camcorder Accessories (973)
- Camera Parts (309)
- Film Cameras (375)
- Flashes (540)
- Lenses And Filters (2031)
- Updates (1)
Tags
Recently Added
- Sony Nikon Canon
- Camera Shoe Flash
- Angle Lens Minolta
- Screen Fuji Oem
- Cap Snap Cap
- Tele Conversion Lens
- Sony Olympus Pentax
- Special Effects Filter
- Hood Kit Canon
- Macro Ring Flash
Calender
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Archives
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (154)
- February 2011 (170)
- January 2011 (164)
- December 2010 (181)
- November 2010 (168)
- October 2010 (213)
- September 2010 (167)
- August 2010 (155)
- July 2010 (171)
- June 2010 (167)
- May 2010 (173)
- April 2010 (174)
- March 2010 (168)
- February 2010 (82)
- January 2010 (75)
- December 2009 (81)
- November 2009 (84)
- October 2009 (88)
- September 2009 (86)
- August 2009 (80)
- July 2009 (83)
- June 2009 (80)
- May 2009 (77)
- April 2009 (90)
- March 2009 (90)
- February 2009 (37)
- January 2009 (30)
- December 2008 (47)
- November 2008 (53)
- October 2008 (44)
- September 2008 (36)
- August 2008 (33)
- July 2008 (47)
- June 2008 (51)
- May 2008 (30)
- April 2008 (30)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (43)
- January 2008 (45)
- December 2007 (42)
- November 2007 (30)
- October 2007 (39)
- September 2007 (32)
- August 2007 (42)
- July 2007 (44)
- June 2007 (41)
- May 2007 (44)
- April 2007 (34)
- March 2007 (47)
- February 2007 (40)
- January 2007 (12)














